Association between the Orthopaedic Trauma Society classification of open fractures and economic costs.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) classification of open fractures and economic costs. METHODS: Resource use was measured during the six months that followed open fractures of the lower limb in 748 adults recruited as part of two large clinical trials within the UK Major Trauma Research Network. Resource inputs were valued using unit costs drawn from primary and secondary sources. Economic costs (GBP sterling, 2017 to 2018 prices), estimated from both a NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective, were related to the degree of complexity of the open fracture based on the OTS classification. RESULTS: Adjusted mean total NHS and PSS costs were £13,785 following treatment of complex fractures and £3,550 following treatment of simple fractures, where the open fracture wound is closed at the end of the first wound debridement, generating a mean difference of £10,235 (95% confidence interval £8,074 to £12,396). CONCLUSION: Following previous work correlating clinical outcomes with the OTS classification of open fractures, this study suggests that the new OTS classification also correlates with economic costs estimated from alternative study perspectives. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):408-412.

The Orthopaedic Trauma Society classification of open fractures.

AIMS: To describe a new objective classification for open fractures of the lower limb and to correlate the classification with patient-centred outcomes. METHODS: The proposed classification was investigated within a cohort of adults with open fractures of the lower limb who were recruited as part of two large clinical trials within the UK Major Trauma Network. The classification was correlated with patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life in the year after injury, and with deep infection at 30 days, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of a deep surgical site infection. RESULTS: A total of 748 participants were included in the analysis. Of these, 288 (38.5%) had a simple open fracture and 460 (61.5%) had a complex fracture as defined by the new classification system. At 12 months, the mean DRI in the simple fracture group was 32.5 (SD 26.8) versus 43.9 (SD 26.1) in the complex fracture group (odds ratio (OR) 8.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.69 to 12.69). At 12 months the mean health-related quality of life (EQ-5D utility) in the simple fracture group was 0.59 (SD 0.29) versus 0.56 (SD 0.32) in the complex fracture group (OR -0.03; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02). The differences in the rate of deep infection at 30 days was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The Orthopaedic Trauma Society open fracture classification is based upon objective descriptors of the injury and correlates with patient-centred outcomes in a large cohort of open fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1469-1474.

Masquelet technique for open tibia fractures in a military setting.

PURPOSE: The induced membrane technique (IMT) is a two-stage procedure dedicated to reconstruction of bone defects of the limbs. The objective of this report was to evaluate employment of the IMT for the treatment of open tibia fractures managed in a military trauma center treating both wartime and peacetime injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed among the patients treated via IMT for tibial bone defects related to open fractures between 2009 and 2018. The outcomes recorded included bone union, residual infection, amputation and lower limb function. RESULTS: During this period, 15 patients with a mean age of 39 years were included for the treatment of Gustilo II (2 cases) or Gustilo IIIB (13 cases) injuries. A mean number of 2.9 debridements were required before stage 1. Flap coverage was associated in 14 cases. The mean interval between stages was 22 weeks. Five patients were re-operated on after stage 1 due to persistent infection. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Bone union was achieved in 13 of the 15 cases (87%) at a mean time of 10.1 months. However, seven additional bone healing procedures were required, including six inter-tibiofibular grafting. Only one late septic recurrence was found. Most patients returned to work in sedentary jobs. CONCLUSIONS: This series is the first to report IMT use in a military setting. The prior eradication of infection constitutes a major challenge in tibial bone defects, especially in high-energy, multi-tissue injuries. An inter-tibiofibular bone reconstruction approach is required when external fixation is chosen.

Reconstruction of Gustilo Type IIIC Injuries of the Lower Extremity.

BACKGROUND: Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures are characterized by an ischemic limb requiring immediate arterial repair. In this patient population, the decision between primary amputation and limb salvage can be challenging. This study aims to evaluate the reconstructive outcomes of patients with Gustilo type IIIC injuries. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of 806 lower extremity free flaps from 1976 to 2016 was performed. Flap loss and salvage rates for patients with Gustilo type IIIC injuries were determined. To determine the utility of performing salvage in this group, outcomes of the IIIC reconstructions were compared to those of similar patients with Gustilo I type IIB injuries with only a single patent vessel. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with Gustilo type IIIC injuries underwent reconstruction after traumatic injury. Ten patients (31.3 percent) experienced a perioperative complication, including seven unplanned returns to the operating room (21.9 percent), three partial flap losses (9.4 percent), and five complete flap losses (15.6 percent). When type IIIC injuries were compared with single-vessel Gustilo type IIIB injuries, no statistically significant differences were noted with respect to major perioperative complications (p = 0.527), unplanned return to the operating room (p = 0.06), partial flap loss (p = 0.209), complete flap loss (p = 0.596), or salvage rate (p = 0.368). Although this result was not statistically significant, Gustilo type IIIC injuries trended toward lower take-back rates and higher salvage rates compared with single-vessel Gustilo type IIIB injuries. CONCLUSION: Patients with Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures should be considered candidates for limb salvage, as flap loss and reconstruction of these injuries are comparable to those of the routinely reconstructed single-vessel runoff type IIIB injuries. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Comparative study of the efficacy of gentamicin-coated intramedullary interlocking nail versus regular intramedullary interlocking nail in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures.

PURPOSE: Open tibia fracture is prone to infection, consequently causing significant morbidity and increasing the hospital stay, occupational loss and onset of chronic osteomyelitis. Intramedullary nailing is one choice for treating tibia shaft fractures. To improve the delivery of antibiotics at the tissue-implant interface, many methods have been proposed as a part of prophylaxis against infection. This study was conducted to study the role of gentamicin-impregnated intramedullary interlocking (IMIL) nail in the prevention of infection in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures and to compare the results with regular intramedullary nail. METHODS: The study included 28 patients with open tibia fractures (Gustilo type 1 or type 2); of them 14 underwent regular IMIL nailing and the other 14 were treated with gentamicin-coated nailing. Randomization was done by alternate allocation of the patients. Follow-up was done postoperatively (day 1), 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months for bone union, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin and C-reactive protein (CRP). Statistical significance was tested using unpaired t-test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 4 cases of infection in controls (regular IMIL nail) and no infection among patients treated with gentamicin-coated nail during the follow up (X2 = 4.66, p = 0.031). At 6 months postoperatively, CRP (p = 0.031), ESR (p = 0.046) and hemoglobin level (p = 0.016) showed significant difference between two groups. The bone healing rate was better with gentamicin-coated nail in comparison to regular IMIL nail at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Gentamicin-coated IMIL nail has a positive role in preventing infection in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures.

Acute Treatment of Open Foot and Ankle Fractures Using a Bioartificial Dermal Regeneration Template and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Two patients with open foot and ankle fractures were treated with aggressive irrigation and debridement and acute placement of a dermal regeneration template (DRT) followed by split-thickness skin grafting. Patient 1 was an 82-year-old female with a type IIIB open ankle fracture complexed with 2 significant regions of soft tissue loss. Patient 2 was a 54-year-old male with type IIIB open metatarsal fractures. Both patients healed without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Complex open fractures in lower extremities can be managed with acute DRT application. This may be a more cost-effective solution compared to free flaps.

Type III open tibia fractures in low-resources setting. Part 3: achievement of bone union and treatment of segmental bone defects.

After presentations of the principles of limb salvage and soft-tissue coverage for Gustilo III open tibia fractures, this third part is dedicated to management of tibial non-unions in low-resource settings. Inter-tibiofibular grafting and the induced membrane technique are preferred because they make it possible to deal with almost all situations. Key technical points of these methods are presented, followed by treatment guidelines based on Catagni's classification and bone defect size.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Management of Open Fractures: A Systematic Survey of Current Practice and Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Evidence with regard to antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with open fractures of the extremities is limited. We therefore conducted a systematic survey addressing current practice and recommendations. METHODS: We included publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for clinical studies and surveys of surgeons; WorldCat for textbooks; and web sites for guidelines and institutional protocols. RESULTS: We identified 223 eligible publications that reported 100 clinical practice patterns and 276 recommendations with regard to systemic antibiotic administration, and 3 recommendations regarding local antibiotic administration alone. Most publications of clinical practice patterns used regimens with both gram-positive and gram-negative coverage and continued the administration for 2 to 3 days. Most publications recommended prophylactic systemic antibiotics. Most recommendations suggested gram-positive coverage for less severe injuries and administration duration of 3 days or less. For more severe injuries, most recommendations suggested broad antimicrobial coverage continued for 2 to 3 days. Most publications reported intravenous administration of antibiotics immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice and recommendations strongly support early systemic antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with open fractures of the extremities. Differences in antibiotic regimens, doses, and durations of administration remain in both practice and recommendations. Consensus with regard to optimal practice will likely require well-designed randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current survey of literature systematically provides surgeons' practice and the available expert recommendations from 2007 to 2017 on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in the management of open fractures of extremities.

Long-term outcomes after high-energy open tibial fractures: Is a salvaged limb superior to prosthesis in terms of physical function and quality of life?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe complication rates and long-term functional outcomes among patients with amputated versus reconstructed limb after high-energy open tibial fractures. METHODS: Patients treated operatively for a high-energy open tibial fracture, classified as Gustilo-Anderson (GA) grade 3, at our hospital in the time period 2004-2013 were invited to a clinical and radiographic follow-up at minimum 2 years after injury. Eighty-two patients with 87 GA grade 3 fractures were included. There were 39 type GA 3A, 34 GA 3B, and 14 GA 3C. RESULTS: The GA 3A reconstruction group had the lowest complication rate and the best long-term outcome scores at mean 5 years (range 2-8 years) after injury. Within the group of GA 3B and 3C fractures, we found no significant differences in long-term outcomes among patients with reconstructed versus amputated limbs. The mean physical component summary score of the SF-36 in the reconstruction versus amputation group was 54.2 (95% CI 46.3-62.1) versus 47.7 (95% CI 32.6-62.2), respectively (p = 0.524), while the mean mental component summary score was 63.7 (95% CI 50.6-71.8) versus 59.2 (95% CI 48.8-68.0), respectively (p = 0.603). On the 6-minute walk test, the reconstruction group walked on average 493 m (95% CI 447-535 m) versus 449 m (95% CI 384-518 m) in the amputation group. The return to work rate was 73% (16 of 22) in the reconstruction group versus 50% (7 of 14) in the amputation group (p = 0.166). The mean patient satisfaction score (VAS 0-100) was 67 (95% CI 67-77) in the reconstruction group versus 65 (95% CI 51-76) in the amputation group (p = 0.795). Regardless of the treatment strategy, the complication rate was high. CONCLUSIONS: Amputation should be considered as a viable treatment option, equal to limb salvage, after high-energy open tibial fracture with severe vascular damage or soft tissue loss.

Managing the open calcaneal fracture: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Open fractures of the calcaneus are rare. They are mostly caused by high-energy trauma. There are several treatment options for calcaneal fractures. However, treatment of open calcaneal fractures might need a different approach, as open calcaneal fractures are associated with high rates of complications. The purpose of this study was to provide a literature overview on the management of open calcaneal fractures, and deduct a more standardized treatment algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review was conducted in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for articles describing the management of open calcaneal fractures. Excluded were studies with less than 10 patients, studies describing combat injuries and reviews. Only articles published from 1998 to 2017 were included and there were no language restrictions. RESULTS: A total of 18 articles were included with 616 open calcaneal fractures in 598 patients. Most wounds were Gustilo grade III and most fractures were Sanders type III. Definitive surgery was performed after a mean of 9.8days and in most cases in the form of ORIF via ELA. The complication rate was 21% and the mean AOFAS score was 73.7 points. CONCLUSION: The complication rates of open calcaneal fractures are high and increase with the severity of the wound. A treatment algorithm is suggested. However, to produce a more evidence-based protocol and achieve consensus for treatment, additional research should be done, preferably in the form of a prospective multicenter database.

Antibiotics and open fractures of the lower extremity: less is more.

PURPOSE: Infectious complications in open lower extremity fractures contribute to significant morbidity. Historically, orthopedic guidelines have recommended Grade III fractures receive a first generation cephalosporin and an aminoglycoside. Despite these guidelines, few studies have evaluated the utility of adding an aminoglycoside in this patient population. At our trauma center, we have a unique trauma service where half of our surgeons treat Grade III open fractures with a cephalosporin alone and half use a cephalosporin + aminoglycoside. We hypothesized that our outcomes were the same between the two groups. METHODS: We identified all Grade III fractures of the lower extremity admitted to our urban Level I Trauma Center over the 5-year study period. Charts were retrospectively reviewed to identify demographic information, injury severity score (ISS), fracture location, grade of fracture, type of antibiotic administered, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), surgical site infection (SSI), hardware removal, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and disposition. Patients were classified into two groups: those treated with a cephalosporin alone (CEPH) or cephalosporin + an aminoglycoside (CEPH + AG). RESULTS: A total of 126 grade III fractures of the lower extremity were admitted our Trauma Center during the 5-year study period. There were 65 (52%) patients in the CEPH group and 61 (48%) in the CEPH + AG group. Demographics, ISS, fracture location, grade of fracture, rate of SSI, need for hardware removal, and disposition were not different between the two groups. In contrast, patients in the CEPH group had a 4% incidence of AKI, while the incidence was 10% of patients in the CEPH + AG group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of an AG to antibiotic prophylaxis in open lower extremity fractures was associated with a significant increase in AKI with no change in the incidence of wound infection or hardware removal. Cephalosporins alone may be sufficient for prophylaxis in Grade III open fractures of the lower extremity. A large-scale prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings and inform clinical practice.

The Evolution and Interpretation of the Gustilo and Anderson Classification.

BACKGROUND: The Gustilo classification is the most established system for classifying open fractures. Despite this, the classification has changed in how it has been described and interpreted. We have traced how this classification has slowly evolved throughout the literature over the past 4 decades. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was undertaken with the MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases to source relevant articles that have evolved the interpretation of the Gustilo classification. The references from these articles were consecutively hand-searched to find other articles that describe the Gustilo classification. RESULTS: There was a total of 393 results from the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS): 95 from MEDLINE, 49 from Embase, and 249 from PubMed. Fifty-six articles were initially selected; an additional 67 articles were retrieved through reference checking and further checking of relevant articles until no additional relevant articles could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The original Gustilo and Anderson classification initially was modified by Gustilo before subtle changes were made to the descriptors in the 1990s. Some authors have used the Gustilo classification to create alternative classifications, but these have not gained traction. Other contemporaneous literature has modified the Gustilo-IIIB subtypes to better stratify functional and reconstructive outcomes following vascular injury. The impact and longevity of such recent modifications are yet to be known.

Type III open tibia fractures in low-resource setting. Part 2: soft-tissue coverage with simple, reliable and replicable pedicle flaps.

After limb salvage based on debridement and external fixation, Gustilo IIIB open tibia fractures must undergo soft-tissue repair within 7 days. In low-resource setting, the coverage is performed with pedicled flaps only, which can be used by any orthopedic surgeon after minimal training. The authors describe here the simplified use of 7 basic flap transfers that can deal with almost all soft tissue defects. The diffusion of these techniques in developing countries is crucial for limiting functional and trophic effects related to prolonged exposure of the fracture site.

[Severely dislocated fracture of neck of talus initially treated outside of trauma centre].

Fracture of the talus is usually the result of a high-energy trauma and can present as an open fracture. This is a case report of an 18-year-old male with an open dislocated fracture of the neck of the talus, and the primary treatment consisted of: administration of antibiotics, tetanus prophylaxis, debridement and wound irrigation, reduction of fracture, immobilisation in external fixation and wound closure. Later, the patient had osteosynthesis of the fracture due to nonunion.

Type III open tibia fractures in low-resources setting. Part 1: strategy and principles of limb salvage.

In developing countries, road traffic accidents result in many cases of open trauma, especially fractures, with the tibia area at particular risk in motorcycle crashes. Despite a high prevalence of severe leg trauma with multi-tissue injuries, few studies have focused on the challenge of their reconstruction in these limited-resource settings. The first part of this review presents the surgical strategy. Limitations and principles of initial limb salvage are detailed. Orthopedic procedures for early damage control, based on debridement and temporary bone stabilization, are often required. The priority is to shorten the time to initial surgical management to avoid infection, which jeopardizes reconstruction.

Comparative accuracy assessment of the Gustilo and Tscherne classification systems as predictors of infection in open fractures / Análise comparativa da acurácia das classificações de Gustilo e Tscherne como preditoras de infecção em fraturas expostas

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study is to analyze the accuracy of the two classification systems for open fractures most commonly used in current medical practice, Gustilo and Tscherne, as predictors of infection. Methods A retrospective observational study was performed, including 121 patients suffering from open fracture of the appendicular skeleton treated at an emergency hospital. The fractures were classified according to Gustilo and Tscherne systems during the initial treatment, and ratings were subsequently confirmed or rectified during hospitalization. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated according to each classification adopted. Results The results of this study demonstrated that both classifications of Gustilo and Tscherne are associated with the clinical outcome of infection in open fractures. The Gustilo classification achieved sensitivity of 76.7%, specificity of 53.8%, and accuracy of 59.5%. Tscherne's classification had a sensitivity of 56.7%, specificity 82.4%, and accuracy of 76.1%. Conclusion The Tscherne system showed better accuracy, including specificity as a predictor of infection in open fractures, when compared with the Gustilo system.

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar comparativamente a acurácia dos dois sistemas para classificação de fraturas expostas mais usados na prática médica atual, Gustilo e Tscherne, como preditores de infecção nas fraturas expostas. Métodos Foi feito um estudo observacional retrospectivo com 121 indivíduos acometidos por fratura exposta do esqueleto apendicular atendidos em uma unidade de emergência hospitalar. As fraturas expostas foram classificadas segundo os dois sistemas durante o atendimento inicial; as classificações eram posteriormente confirmadas ou retificadas durante o internamento. Foram calculados sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivos positivos e negativos e acurácia, segundo cada classificação adotada. Resultados Os resultados demonstraram que ambas as classificações, de Gustilo e de Tscherne, apresentam associação com o desfecho clínico infecção em fraturas expostas. A classificação de Gustilo obteve sensibilidade de 76,7%, especificidade de 53,8% e acurácia de 59,5%. A classificação de Tscherne obteve sensibilidade de 56,7%, especificidade de 82,4% e acurácia de 76,1%. Conclusão O sistema de classificação de Tscherne demonstrou maior acurácia, apresentou melhor especificidade como preditor de infecção em fraturas expostas quando comparado com o sistema de Gustilo.

An interobserver reliability comparison between the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's open fracture classification and the Gustilo and Anderson classification.

AIMS: To evaluate interobserver reliability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's open fracture classification system (OTA-OFC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients of any age with a first presentation of an open long bone fracture were included. Standard radiographs, wound photographs, and a short clinical description were given to eight orthopaedic surgeons, who independently evaluated the injury using both the Gustilo and Anderson (GA) and OTA-OFC classifications. The responses were compared for variability using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement was ĸ = 0.44 for the GA classification and ĸ = 0.49 for OTA-OFC, which reflects moderate agreement (0.41 to 0.60) for both classifications. The agreement in the five categories of OTA-OFC was: for skin, ĸ = 0.55 (moderate); for muscle, ĸ = 0.44 (moderate); for arterial injury, ĸ = 0.74 (substantial); for contamination, ĸ = 0.35 (fair); and for bone loss, ĸ = 0.41 (moderate). CONCLUSION: Although the OTA-OFC, with similar interobserver agreement to GA, offers a more detailed description of open fractures, further development may be needed to make it a reliable and robust tool. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:242-6.